Digital Nation Talks about how
the US military uses un-manned air drones to take out enemy targets
from up to 9 miles away, and then drive home in 30 minutes to eat
dinner with their family. The video discusses how the operator cannot
tell whether everyone that was killed in the air strikes is an enemy
combatant or a civilian casualty. It also talks about how it builds
large facilities in the cities so kids can go play games of call of
duty to try and sell them into joining whatever branch they like by
using the adrenaline rush to join. And although military members and
the teens playing these games understand the difference between real
and fake, the parents are a little outraged at this.
Being in the military myself, I have
seen firsthand how technology has affected the lives of soldiers,
especially combat-job oriented soldiers. We now have deployable
robots to disable bombs, take out enemy snipers, and evacuate
wounded. Jobs that would require a soldier to put his life at risk
are now done by the work of robots so that a human life can go home
to his family. We have simulation rooms to teach us how to drive
armored vehicles and aircraft as well as simulated weapon systems.
This technology gives us an edge of getting an actual feel of what we
are driving, and gets us ready for when we engage in the real thing
as well as training for when we operate certain weapons systems so
that we can minimize accidents. Drones are another such technology.
Yes, pilots can still get PTSD, but my only concern with this video
is the aftermath of a drone strike. I feel as though they don’t
(video producers) really know what actually happens after a drone
strike. They send small recon teams in to survey, assess, and record
every detail in the area. They take in casualties and catalogue
everything for future reference. The drone pilot has to also fill out
a report as well as ground teams. Everyone involved knows the outcome
in the end. As for telling whether or not a pilot of a drone has
taken out any civilians on accident. Tell me how anyone can tell an
enemy combatant from a civilian in the theatre of war in the Middle
East?
Military centers
are not just for recruiting. The military is actively engaged within
a lot of communities on helping them. These facilities being built
for young teens are designed to keep good relations with the future
communities of the United States. Yes, recruiting happens there and I
am sure that some recruiters use these facilities to lure someone in
the Army, Navy, Marines, etc., but The idea that these places solely
try to do such an act, to me, is a generation gap. Within both topics
there are older people not really understanding the technology with
which us younger people grew up with. It comes natural to us to the
point where we understand the difference of what is real and what is
fake on a virtual to real life basis. Older generations that haven’t
grown up with such technology are not used to such things, and since
they do run the world, they show their mis-understandings
I completely agree with your there about the generation gap. You are right that there is a gap it's hard to believe but it is true.
ReplyDeleteThe first hand experiences really helped to solidify your points being made. Pictures might help to show readers exactly what you're talking about with either drones or the video game centers. Overall I thought this was a very well expressed article.
ReplyDelete